FBI Celebrates Foiling Its Own Terror Plot, Again

infowars/Federal agents convinced a naïve, violence-inclined 21-year-old Bangladeshi that he was a member of “al-Qaeda,” giving the dupe fake bombs to blow up the Federal Reserve Bank of New York before swarming in and arresting him on October 17. As has become typical, government officials scrambled to put out press releases patting themselves on the back for their work protecting the “Homeland.”
In reality, however, there was no al-Qaeda, there was no threat, there were no bombs, and the only alleged “plot” the FBI “foiled” was the one it helped hatch with its dupe, Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis. Like the vast majority of recent domestic “terror” schemes against the United States, the latest supposed “operation” was essentially run by authorities from start to finish.
“It is important to emphasize that the public was never at risk in this case, because two of the defendant’s ‘accomplices’ were actually an FBI source and an FBI undercover agent,” Acting Assistant FBI Director Mary Galligan admitted in a press release celebrating the arrest. “The FBI continues to place the highest priority on preventing acts of terrorism.”
The criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court also confirmed that authorities gave their dupe bogus explosives to carry out the bogus attack. “The material that purported to be the explosive material was actually inert and posed no threat to the safety of the public,” the document confirmed, fueling more criticism of the government’s terror-war tactics that include cultivating terrorists and supplying all their terror needs.
The apparently dim-witted young man from Bangladesh was in the United States on a student visa when he allegedly tried to find others to join him in carrying out an attack. According to the criminal complaint, he miraculously managed to find an FBI source to help on his mission. The confidential informant promptly introduced him to government agents who promised to assist.
“I don’t want something that’s like, small,” Nafis allegedly told an undercover agent who was posing as an al-Qaeda member and wearing a recording device. “I just want something big. Something very big. Very, very, very, very big, that will shake the whole country.” He was apparently hoping to “destroy America” with an attack that would bring Muslims closer to running “the whole world.”
Despite claiming to have “connections,” authorities had to convince Nafis that he really was part of al-Qaeda. “The thing that I want to ask you about is that, the thing I’m doing, is it under al-Qaeda?” the confused would-be “terrorist” asked one of his government handlers. The unidentified undercover law-enforcement officer assured the bewildered dupe that the attack would indeed be for “al-Qaeda.”

• A d v e r t i s e m e n t

In numerous similar setups where the FBI has persuaded dupes to help plot “terror” attacks, the government offered big money in an effort to get the schemes off the ground. It remains unclear whether Nafis was given any cash reward for his “services.” However, most everything else was supplied by law enforcement — including the bogus bombs.
The undercover agent, for example, asked Nafis what he would need to carry out his “attack.” The dupe responded that he would need “a big car with lots of fruits and vegetables in there which can blow up the whole New York Stock Exchange building.” Nafis later proudly told a separate government informant, after being convinced by his handler, of course, that he was now officially a member of “al-Qaeda.”
At one point, Nafis told his handlers that he wanted to go home to see his family before the attack. However, the agents told him not to do that because law enforcement might “detect” its own plot. More than likely, Nafis was urged not to go home to ensure that the FBI would have somebody to arrest after hatching its complex bogus terror plot over a period of several months. His handlers told him “al-Qaeda” would stop helping him if he went home, court documents show.
As soon as news of the arrest was publicly announced, commentators across the Internet slammed and ridiculed the FBI and the federal government for continuing to prod dupes into carrying out bogus attacks. Perhaps anticipating that critics would cry foul at yet another “foiled” government-orchestrated “terror” plot, federal officials said they had to proceed with the setup to ensure that Nafis would not go plot an attack on his own.
“We have an obligation to take action to protect the public when an individual expresses a desire to commit violence and recruits others for an attack,” Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd was quoted as saying. “Allowing such individuals to proceed without a government response is not an option, given that they may take action on their own or find others willing to assist them.”
Indeed, if the criminal complaint is to be believed, it is true that Nafis was anything but an upstanding citizen. After the FBI convinced him that he was a member of “al-Qaeda” and that his government handler was working with “al-Qaeda leadership,” for example, the would-be terrorist said he knew there would be innocent casualties, including women and children. Still, he told his handlers he was ready to proceed.
Nafis also purportedly hoped the plot he hatched with the FBI would disrupt the upcoming presidential election. According to the criminal complaint, he was apparently an admirer of former CIA asset Osama bin Laden, too.
The dupe was arrested after using a cellphone to try to detonate the fake bomb the FBI gave him. He was charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) and attempting to provide material support to al-Qaeda. If convicted, he could face life in prison.
Last year, federal authorities hatched a similar half-baked plot, using a convicted felon to deceive a group of young self-styled left-wing anarchists into trying to blow up a bridge near Cleveland. A separate case in 2009 in which a government informer convinced dupes to plant fake bombs in New York even drew criticism from the judge who oversaw the case, who said: “The government made them terrorists.”
Government-hatched terror attacks, despite generating a lot of headlines, paranoia, and budget increases for the terror war, have still come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. “Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones?” wondered author David Shipler in a piece for theNew York Times earlier this year about the absurdity of manufacturing terror plots to stop terror.
Analysts speculated that the most recent bogus “terror” scheme would be seized upon by the privately owned Federal Reserve banking cartel to portray itself as a potential target. The fake attack might also pave the way to helping paint the Fed’s growing number of vocal critics as potentially dangerous — at least if the FBI can find them, radicalize them, and give them money and fake explosives.
While the FBI was busy convincing Nafis that he was a member of “al-Qaeda,” a terror group largely created and funded by the U.S. government decades ago, the Obama administration and Western powers were providing arms and money to real self-styled al-Qaeda fighters waging “jihad” in Syria. Before that, known al-Qaeda leaders were benefiting from overwhelming support from the Obama administration in the fight to oust Libya’s former despot, Moammar Gadhafi.
Whether Nafis would have been able or even willing to carry out any real attack without months of prodding by authorities will remain a mystery — he can be convicted based on current U.S. law regardless. What has become clear, though, is that the vast majority of “attacks” supposedly “foiled” over the last decade would never have made it into even the planning stages without government assistance.

Are You A Zombie?

infowars/Are you a zombie? Do you react instinctively to external stimulus without engaging in thought? Are your opinions of what happens in the world shaped by your own intuition and knowledge or by television and mass media? Are you trapped in a state of consciousness that more closely resembles sleep than waking reality?

Chances are that if you are reading this article you don’t consider yourself a zombie, but make no mistake about it, you are surrounded by them. Some of them may be your co-workers, friends or even your family members.
America is fast turning into a zombie nation and it didn’t happen by accident, it happened by design.
The system has declared war on human consciousness. Using every tool available to them, the controllers have set about trying to create through behavioral modification and social engineering a race of beings who more closely resemble fictional zombies than actual properly functioning people.
They have achieved this primarily through the medium of television. As Steve Watson explains in his article, The Idiot Box: How TV Is Turning Us All Into Zombies, studies have confirmed that watching television or even having it on in the background actually impairs brain development in children – damaging their ability to learn cognitive thinking and develop language as well as increasing their chances of developing ADHD and social problems.
Television programs watched by children increase aggressive tendencies while decreasing attention spans, creating a zombie-like reactionary mindset that represents the antithesis of true knowledge and enlightenment.
For adults, television has been proven to alter consciousness by reducing brain activity to below Delta frequency, ensuring that critical thinking is bypassed and whatever message being pushed is emotionally embraced with total disregard for any form of logic.
Watching television also has the effect of releasing endorphins which act as a kind of happy sedative for the viewer, putting them in a trance-like state wherein they become highly suggestible and compliant to brainwashing.
This is why there is just as much propaganda if not more embedded in fictional television shows compared to news programs. In 2006, the Fox network admitted they were inserting messages into sitcoms and dramas as a form of social engineering to make viewers accept the reality of man-made global warming rhetoric.
More recently it was reported that U.S. taxpayers would fund a multi-million dollar effort to have television shows made in Hollywood promote ObamaCare in their storylines.
Television is the modern-day equivalent of Plato’s allegory of the cave. The zombies are beholden to a projection of reality completely manufactured by the controllers. Instead of debating real issues, the zombies can only debate the intricacies of soap operas, sports, or partisan politics which is merely another form of the soap opera in a contrived political context.
TV also projects a false culture on the western world and indoctrinates the viewer that the bizarre, animalistic and decadent behavior they see is normal and should be emulated.
The role of TV is not only to manipulate behavior and opinion, it is to fill the viewer with a sense of self-loathing, inadequacy and worthlessness.
This plays into the controllers’ plan to portray humanity as a cancerous plague upon the earth – much like a horde of zombies – that should at best be micromanaged, dominated and enslaved, and at worst simply eliminated altogether.
Death and decadence are promoted at every opportunity. This attitude was encapsulated most recently by television host Bill Maher when he said that the media should “promote death” – through encouraging abortion, suicide and the death penalty – because there are too many people on the planet.
We are constantly bombarded with the myth that there are too many of us on the earth, that human life is not precious, and that we are pointless scum with no destiny or purpose in our lives. This culture of death is repeatedly rammed down our throats.
This is nothing less than a deliberate ploy to make the zombie accept the notion that he has no dignity and can be rolled over and enslaved at any point.
This culture of death is also contributing to an evisceration of human empathy. How many stories have you seen over the last few years of people simply walking by and ignoring someone who is lying dead or dying in the street pleading for help? We are being zombiefied by being disconnected from our human emotions. The things that separate humans from animals – love, compassion and caring – are under constant attack.
While in the past, our heroes were trailblazers, inventors, poets, great authors, painters and scientists, today’s heroes are reality TV stars and celebrities who exhibit some of the very worst aspects of human nature – greed, selfishness, arrogance, nihilism and superficiality.
Our heroes in the past were people who pushed the envelope of human creativity and endeavor. The people our media now exalts as heroes are treated as Gods for achieving nothing besides fame itself.
While the zombie lives most of his or her life in a trance-like state, a key component of the condition is to be able to tolerate abuse and indignity without feeling the natural human impulse to resist or even complain.
This mass psychological Stockholm Syndrome, where the victim actually feels empathy and positive feelings for their captors, is played out on a daily basis. A recent poll showed that despite the federal agency being caught in scandals and stories about abuse multiple times weekly, the majority of Americans still think the TSA is doing a good job.
Huge numbers of American zombies are living with battered wife syndrome. Their government has screwed them on every front and yet unlike across Europe where civil unrest has raged over the last two years, Americans have sat back and done virtually nothing.
A mass psychosis of normalcy bias has gripped the American zombie. Rather than actually taking steps to respond to, prepare for, or even acknowledge the fact that the economy, the country and society itself are all collapsing, the zombie instead chooses to enter a catatonic state where all warnings are ignored and feel-good propaganda is gleefully embraced as gospel truth.
The zombie is enraptured by a state of suspended disbelief, a dream-like state that makes them sponges for indoctrination and behavior modification.
In a recent article entitled Why Are Americans So Easy to Manipulate?, Bruce E Levine explains how the authoritarian rulers in charge of our society are using mental health and psychological conditioning techniques to lobotomize our free will and ability to think independently.
“Today, the mental health profession has gone beyond behavioral technologies of control. It now diagnoses noncompliant toddlers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and pediatric bipolar disorder and attempts to control them with heavily sedating drugs. While Big Pharma directly profits from drug prescribing, the entire corporatocracy benefits from the mental health profession’s legitimization of conditioning and controlling,” writes Levine.
Added to television, Big Pharma along with the poisoning of our air, food and water are the primary drivers of the zombie plague.
- Studies have confirmed that sodium fluoride in the water supply not only causes cancer but according to a recent Harvard study also lowers IQ. Anecdotal evidence clearly suggests that Americans are getting dumber and are more easily led to believe lies as a result of their low intelligence.
- MSG in our food, more and more of which is genetically modified, is causing Americans to become fatter and lazier. Additives and pesticides in food are leading to a general lack of concentration and apathy, impairing brain stimulation.
- Vaccines contain mercury, a deadly toxin that accumulates in the brain.
- More than a quarter of children and an increasing number of adults in America are on anti-depressants that keep them in a permanent state of zombiefied confusion – dazed, mesmerized, and easy to indoctrinate.
Only by withdrawing from the artificial reality that has been woven around us can we hope to avoid being infected by the zombie plague. You have to be in the world but not of it.
While there may be little hope for the hordes of zombies who have already long since sacrificed their free will and capacity for critical thought over to the juggernaut of social engineering, there is ample opportunity for those who continue to reach out for spiritual and intellectual enlightenment to re-assert their individuality by restricting their exposure to mass entertainment and television, avoiding the ravages of Big Pharma, eating the right foods and maintaining a positive outlook on life.
These are all obvious steps to take and yet the majority of Americans will probably fail to take even one of them in their entire life – a fact that pleases the social engineers and helps maintain a steady supply of zombies to help convince the rest of humanity that resistance to zombiefication is futile.

 

BBC In “War Crime” Cover-Up Controversy

INFOWARS/The BBC has dug itself a deeper hole in the aftermath of a censorship controversy which saw the broadcaster pull a video about Syrian rebels forcing a prisoner to become an unwitting suicide bomber, with the BBC claiming its reporter never characterized the incident as a “war crime” when in fact the opposite is true.
As we highlighted yesterday, a video clip showing a prisoner being made by Syrian rebels to drive a truck full of explosives to a military checkpoint in Aleppo was pulled from both the BBC website and the official BBC channel on You Tube hours after it was published. Bloggers were able to capture and upload a copy of the video which can be viewed below.
BBC World News editor John Williams responded to the controversy in a blog post on the BBC News website by noting that “the story has generated much interest across the Arab World and beyond.”
Though Williams fails to address why the BBC has sent the story down the memory hole, he does attempt to explain away the fact that the events depicted in the footage clearly represent a war crime, noting that the attempted murder of a captive has been defined as such by Amnesty International.
“Some pro-government news agencies in Syria have suggested the BBC and the New York Times have termed the act as a “war crime”. This is not true,” claims Williams.

• A d v e r t i s e m e n t

And yet it is true.
At the 2 minute 13 mark in the clip embedded above, BBC reporter Gordon Corera clearly states, “Using prisoners as suicide bombers would certainly be considered a war crime.”
So in fact yes, the BBC did term the act as a “war crime” and John Williams is being brazenly dishonest.
Why is the BBC lying in claiming they didn’t characterize the act as a war crime? Perhaps it’s because their removal of the story constitutes covering up for a war crime. Maybe it made the lawyers and senior editors nervous.
Recall that this is not the first time the BBC has been caught manipulating reporting of events in Syria to push a pro-NATO regime change agenda. Back in May we exposed how the BBC has used a years-old photo of dead Iraqi children to depict victims of an alleged government assault in the town of Houla.
The photographer who took the original picture, Marco Di Lauro, posted on his Facebook page, “Somebody is using my images as a propaganda against the Syrian government to prove the massacre.” Di Lauro told the London Telegraph he was “astonished” the BBC had failed to check the authenticity of the image.
The BBC’s excuse for removing the shocking story about how western-backed Syrian rebels are using unwilling prisoners to carry out terrorist attacks is shaky to say the least.
“Under the terms of the agreement with the New York Times we only had the rights to use the material on broadcast outlets. However the material was used online in error. As soon as we realised the error we immediately took steps to remove the online material,” responded the BBC.
So we’re being asked to believe that the world’s largest news organization doesn’t have a procedure in place where it checks with other major news organizations before using their material.
Even if we are to accept this dubious explanation, the fact that the BBC is now openly lying to its audience in claiming its reporter never characterized the incident as a “war crime” when the opposite is true emphasizes once again how the NATO-aligned media is desperate to uphold the image of Syrian opposition forces as glorious freedom fighters when in fact they are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists while metering out acts of brutality on a par with anything Assad’s forces have been accused of.